BnB’s Espionage Mystery

For the first time in ???, I can’t wait for the next episode of the BnB!  We’re hours away from finding out who the design bandit is.  The suspects are numerous, their potential  motivations are alarming, and the outcome is, we’re told, going to be explosive.  The suspects (in my mind) are:

1.  Ridge Forrester. Ridge’s reported ‘breakdown’ wasn’t as big a break as fans thought.  He heard that Steffy was supposed to drive off with Rick to pick up fabric and panicked.  He removed her from the car, calling her Phoebe in the process.  Ridge has made it clear that he hasn’t fully forgiven Rick for his role in Phoebe’s accidental death.  To have Rick then try to drive off with another of his daughters?  No way, no how.

Was that moment the ‘break’ happened, with the fallout to follow?  Is Ridge’s motivation that he can’t stomach the thought of working with Rick – and that working at Jackie M’s with Nick and Jackie would be less hellish for him than seeing Rick’s face every day? OR Is he doing this to set Rick up for the fall?  Would Rick accept the setup as his punishment for the pain he’s caused his big brother? (They’re still brothers in my book and I refuse to call them anything other than that!)

2.  Thorne Forrester. He’s betrayed his family before and jumped ship to the ‘competitor’ (though how Spectra or Jackie M’s can be considered a competitor given their constant ill fortunes.)  Has he done it again, now realizing that he’s been passed over for Ridge AND Rick and that even the Logan women have nice offices compared to his dark, dank, basement dwelling?  How did Thorne lose the office he had when he served as FC’s President under both his mother AND his father?  How did Owen – the man his father caught cheating with his new wife, rate a much nice office than Thorne?

His motivation?  Self explanatory given the above.  His father is a jerk.

3.  Felicia Forrester. She could have easily sent those designs to set Rick up as well.  I liked the snark in an earlier meeting when she commented that the company’s President wasn’t even aware of what was going on with the competition.  So why is Rick even President?

Her motivation?  She’s an angry rebel, always has been. To cause Rick a great deal of embarrassment and to make her way back to Nick Marone’s side might be all the motivation she needs. Nick has already slept is way through the Logan clan, maybe he’s ready to return to her .  The profits from the FC designs might keep Jackie M’s afloat and will help their son (who still bears the name Dominic) when nick finds out that Jack isn’t really his either… ok, that last part is what I’m hoping for, your mileage may differ.

4. Stephanie Forrester. If Forrester fails, because of a stolen collection, Stephanie could use that to argue to Eric that since he’s brought the entire Logan clan in (and his son with Brooke as President) nothing has been the same.  She could argue that her children with him have always been loyal to the company.  He’s a dunce.  He’ll forget about the fact that all three (Ridge, Thorne, and Felicia) have worked for Spectra in the past and tried to ruin Forrester Creations with their new found power at Spectra.

5.  Katie Logan… OH, but she was disgusted at Nick for using the stolen FC designs for the new Jackie M collection, right?  She’s the show’s version of Jiminy Cricket and would never violate her self-righteous/moral principles.   Sure, on some other show but this is the BnB!  What if Katie’s disgust was feigned and she used it as a way of throwing Nick off track.  Maybe she wanted to find out what he thought of his benefactor before revealing herself.

Her motivation for stealing the designs?  Nick has a habit of bedding the women in her family and then dumping them, or cheating on them and giving them a reason to run.  Katie may have wanted to create a space for herself in his life that he couldn’t so easily erase, or space that she could use to destroy him if he cheated on her — his cheating  is how they got together, after all.

6.  Owen Knight/Marcus Walton. Both are new, both have reasons to worry about the Forresters, and worry about their own position in ‘the family’.  Knight is worried that he’s expendable and soon on the way out.  He hadn’t counted on a relationship with a Forrester heir, and may have decided to try to secure a position for himself in the fashion industry before falling for Bridget.  By the way, why does a Private Investigator now have so much interest in the fashion biz?  I’m still not getting it.  Is there more to Owen’s story?  Was his investigative work linked to corporate espionage before?  It would suck for Bridget if Owen is guilty, but it could make for a great drama as he works to earn back her trust and help the Forresters, in the end.

Marcus lost his first real love to his lying, manipulative sleaze of a cousin, Rick Forrester.  We’re assuming that Marcus doesn’t know what’s going on, but how could he not?  Steffy loved him madly, deeply, truly, before Rick put a move on her. Now she wants nothing to do with him. Rick, who if he was written with an ounce of conscience, wouldn’t run around skipping and smiling at a time like this, he’d still be too depressed from watching Phoebe die in her father’s arms after fighting with Rick about how poorly he treated her.  Maybe the writers will make Marcus more perceptive than he has been in the past.  It could be that Marcus wants to carve a place out for himself, and his mother, who – given Eric’s erratic (not erotic) behavior, has shown that the people he loves are disposable.  Marcus could finally be the person who gets the upper hand on the Forresters!  Though, again, why would he want to be a kingpin in the design industry, it’s not really clear.

If it’s Pam Douglas, Beth or Stephen Logan, Jake MacClaine, Prince Omar, CJ Garrison, Sheila Carter, One of the Baker men, Scout the Dog, Massimo Marone (who could make an unexpected comeback), Brooke Logan, Thomas or Taylor Forrester, Cailtin Ramirez, either of the Kelley women,  Mike the psychotic security guard, James Warrick, or any side character who’s passed through this show over the years – I’ll eat my hat… and I might just post a video of me doing so, on YouTube… maybe.

The problem with GL is this…

I am in awe of fans who love daytime to the point of working to save it, despite what writers and EPs have done by way of making the genre unrecognizable.  Fans are holding on to the hope that not only are daytime brass listening to their concerns, but that they’ll actually do something about them.  It’s not just The Guiding Light.  Daytime fans are in the same position no matter which show they watch.  I’ve chosen to focus on The Guiding Light because of long swirling rumors that the show is on the verge of cancellation (rumors that have persistently dogged this show and its fans for a number of years, now).

Below are five things that I believe have been consistently wrong with the show – five things that are easily corrected. 

1.  Get rid of the ‘live from Peapack’ shots.  Daytime is about fantasy, escapism, and about the impossible becoming plausible.  I have no doubt that Peapack has many homes with lush interiors filled with fine furniture, open floor plans, hardwoods, crown moulding, stainless steel appliances, and custom cabinetry.  It makes sense that the show’s budget doesn’t allow for location shoots in those environments.  Instead, the current interiors are shoddy, and frankly – they’re depressing.  I’ve jokingly referred to Springfield as the land of cheap knotty wood paneling and faux stone.  It’s no longer a joke to me.  I’m distracted by the bad decor and dark interiors when trying to focus on the characters and dialogue.  

It’s hard to see a man like Remy Boudreau  living in a cheap apartment.  His living conditions  make sense for a couple like Daisy and Grady, who have a hard time maintaining steady employment.  On any other show, willingly living in the conditions Remy lives in would be a sign of a character in emotional, psychological or financial distress.  We would ask ourselves if Remy was punishing himself as part of a deep depression, or  an unyielding sense of guilt for some perceived wrong.  The type of decor that’s prevalent on GL usually comes with a liquor bottle and bad attitude on any other soap – and on the GL of the past.

If watching someone like Remy (solidly upper middle/upper class) live in such squalid conditions, think about what it means to see the fabulously wealthy Spauldings live in roughly two cramped rooms, or Olivia live in a tiny farmhouse, or the Lewises wandering from place to place because they have no where to live at all – that we’ve seen.  The exception is Bill Lewis, who lives in a tiny hotel room.  From Remy to the Spauldings to the Lewises –  all are living in spaces that are the sizes of what should be their clothes closets.

Guiding Light is the least aesthetically pleasing show in daytime.  Beautiful people, ugly scenery.  If it’s true that the network is saving money by purchasing/renting the current locations, great!  But there’s a trade-off and given the ratings, I have a feeling that other (former) GL fans are having  a hard time looking at the show in it’s current state. 

2.  Make better use of the big moments and pay homage to your the show’s rich history.  There aren’t a lot of ‘big moments’ left on any show, but GL had the perfect opportunity to grab back some of the show’s glory and to reunite it’s signature couple with this one scene:

As Reva lay dying, Josh confessed his heart and soul to her.  They talked about how long and how deeply they’d loved each.  Josh told her that he  couldn’t conceive of a world that she wasn’t a part of (and we pretended not to remember that he’d already lived through a Reva “death” when she drove off a bridge during the course of her postpartum storyline.  We realized that he meant that he’d already had to live in a Reva-less world once before and that he couldn’t stomach the thought of doing it again).

What happened?  Reva came back to him this time too, and Josh moved on without her.  After all of his tears, his pain, and his comments about not wanting to live without her, not only did he move on but he moved on with her sister.  Both Josh and Cassie treated Reva’s survival as an ‘annoyance’; Josh most especially when Reva let him know that she wanted to save their marriage.  Every moment that took place after the ‘death’ scene made a mockery of Josh and Reva’s epic history. It just did not compute that when the writers could have cleared the coast for this legendary couple, they kept them apart.  The writers were so determined to break them up that Reva defied the laws of  nature.  She became pregnant with another man’s baby after twice undergoing menopause.  You figure that one out.  I can’t and wouldn’t want to if I could.

3.  Allow characters to behave as if they live in the same town.  Either that, or stop having them talk about how much they value family.  Why, dear writers, has Beth put more effort into planning a romantic getaway with her boyfriend than into helping her daughter heal after her kidnapping ordeal?

We’ve seen many more scenes of Coop and Beth pawing each other than we have of Beth embracing Lizzie and trying to help her, most especially since Lizzie has become suspicious that her boyfriend, Bill Lewis, potentially played a role in her abduction.  Is Beth aware of the fact that she’s still Lizzie’s mother?   This is a mother and daughter living in the same house and yet they have very little contact. 

Alan is no angel, either.  He was obsessed with Rafe’s medical care when Gus was alive.  He arranged for Rafe to meet with the top physicians in the country and was willing to pay for advanced medical treatment to control his diabetes.  Now?  Natalia is killing herself to get the medicine Rafe needs by paying for it at her own pharmacy and having it sent to the prison (uh, yeah, that would happen in the real world!).  Why haven’t the Spauldings mentioned Rafe and Natalia?   How has Alan managed to avoid running into Natalia given how many of the same places they both visit?

Why hasn’t Alan already pulled enough strings to have Rafe sleeping in a single cell -with silk sheets covering  his pillow top mattress?  That’s only, of course, until Alan could have him sprung from prison.  Alan has recently gone through a trial and faced prison time.  No sympathy for Rafe?  Is Alan only capable of being obsessed with one grandchild at a time?  Is interfering with Lizzie’s love life REALLY more important than keeping Rafe out of prison, or at least safe while he’s behind bars?  It’s hard to care about Alan’s obsession with Lizzie, given his lack of concern about Rafe.  

4.  Recognize that imitation is not always the sincerest form of flattery.  Guiding Light is working on solving one of it’s biggest problem – the shedding of old school characters and replacing them with newer characters who were meant to serve the same function, but somehow fall flat. In the mad dash to win over the 18 – 24s who were never planning a  mass defection to daytime, great characters like Edmund were cut loose to make room for pale imitations like Kane Manera’s Grady Foley.  Manera is a brilliant actor.  His choices are instinctual and highly consistent.  I like the actor, I just hate the writing for him.  Between the writing and the direction, there was never any hope for Manera’s Grady to become a likable character.  Where David Andrew McDonald’s Edmund was far more nuanced, and more choices about the character appeared to be placed in the actor’s hands, Manera’s Grady was more of a caricature of Edmund and every other GL bad boy.

Grady was never allowed a moment to be ‘human’ (as Edmund was).  Grady was never allowed to develop a backstory that would allow us to see him in a more vulnerable light, as Edmund was.  While Edmund acted out as a way of dealing with the pain of being measured against the impossibly perfect Richard; Grady was just one more sociopath in a family of sociopaths.  I’d like to say that I’ll miss Grady when he eventually goes, but I won’t.   There’s nothing likable or root-worthy left when it comes to this character, through no fault of his portrayer.  

5.  Don’t turn strong storylines and characters into ‘gimmicks’.

Watching Olivia and Natalia this past week, I wondered if the writers have thought about where they’d take the two after their current friendship/relationship ends, and eventually it will.  Will they go back to who they were before?  Are they forever changed?   

Is this only a matter of living in the same home and raising Emma together?  What makes their relationship romantic and not sisterly?  Was Olivia’s lifetime of desperation in every relationship before this related to never feeling loved by any of the men she dated/married.  Was she running from herself?  Does Natalia love Olivia because of who she is? Does she love her because she finally has a feeling of family and she’s been so alone since Rafe was imprisoned and the Spauldings pretend she doesn’t exist?

I like the slow development of their friendship/relationship, but if the writers simply throw them together after a kiss, won’t viewers perceive their relationship as a gimmick of some sort?  It’s already feeling gimmicky with Natalia holding Liv’s hands through the ‘My Two Mommies’ presentation and not ‘getting it’ that the teacher and other parents thought they were lesbians.  A ten year old would have picked that up! 

All it took was a teacher making a suggestion and Olivia has developed new feelings for Natalia?  It feels gimmicky that Olivia can’t use the word ‘lesbian’, but is able to plant a kiss on Natalia to illustrate her point – not long after Frank planted an unplanned kiss on her as well. It’s gimmicky – as Beth’s relationship with Alan was.  It’s becoming as gimmicky as Beth’s relationship with Coop is, or Bill’s amnesia that shouldn’t affect what Lizzie remembers about the kidnapping, or Marina and Mallet and their babymania-out-of-nowhere storyline, or…. you get the point.

If this isn’t a show living on borrowed time, it needs to act like it.  Slow down and take the time to work out the big and the small details.  We’re not going anywhere.