If you haven’t read MarkH’s blog about applauding the experiments in daytime, you should! It’s phenomenal and it truly makes me want to see soaps in the same light that he does. I want to love most of what I’m watching. As I’ve said before, like so many of you, I just feel burned out. Every time I want to trust daytime writers, they do something so shockingly bad, that even when they are doing something right, I’m still recovering from the last crappy storyline.
It’s a nasty little carryover effect.
Case in point? I WANTED to applaud the writers for giving Luke and Noah more airtime this week than they have in quite a while, even before Noah went to Rome. It’s just that the writers spent so much time giving them a storyline they’ve already played out so many times before that it’s losing its effectiveness. Luke has a loving, though highly dysfunctional family. He has great friends. He has more money than a freakin’ bank, and he’s still fighting the good fight over small (though not insignificant) issues.
Hey, even I thought of another storyline that had them facing a little bigotry, but one that I thought would tackle stereotypes about cultural notions of ‘family’. My thought was that Puberty would probably end up parents. (Puberty = Parker and Liberty, non WTers). I’m grateful to the writers that they didn’t go that route, but I thought it was the direction they were headed in, initially. Cousin Luke and Noah could become parents/guardians/whatever, of the child, but not without Janet objecting for religious and personal reasons. Janet would learn, over time, that she had little more than stereotypes about gay families and slowly come around.
Now? Luke and Noah are stuck in ‘older teen hell’ in daytime. Luke is running for class President (or some such) and the big issue is getting a film series going in what should be, or has traditionally been a safe environment for him. I realize that not all academic environments are open and accepting, but I wanted more for Luke . I wish the writers had chosen a storyline that had a significant impact on social issues. This kid is as rich as creases. He could fund his own gay film series and end up throwing enough cash around to have the university administration kissing his toes trying to get a small portion of his fortune. Gimme more, writers, gimme more.
What would happen if Luke suddenly started behaving like the mogul he is? What if his Lucinda gene (yeah, yeah, no biological tie) kicked in? How would Noah react to the ‘new’ Luke? What would happen if another young man from a powerful family came along and tried to woo Luke away from Noah? Noah, the kind and loving, up against an rich and devious snot how has images of merged fortunes dancing in his head? Ruh roh!
I WANT to applaud the Bold and The Beautiful for realizing that it’s the women of the show that really make the BnB world go round. ARGH, the problem is that the writers are going back to the Brooke-Taylor, and Brooke vs the doubled headed hell hound Stephanie-Taylor. We’ve been down that round a million times. It’s all the show had to offer for nearly 14 years.
Why can’t Stephanie lighten up? Why can’t she smarten up? I’d have love for the writers to follow the storyline that was rumored to take place. Brooke and Ridge would start their own company. Imagine Stephanie taking over FC (as she should have LONG ago rather than leaving it to Eric and cheesy Donna). Imagine Stephanie talking herself into believing that if she ruined Ridge and Brooke’s company, it would bring her baby boy home to her –There’s a word for that! You might have been thinking DELUSIONAL, and you’d be right. I, however, was thinking about the word ‘OEDIPAL” in explaining Stephanie’s constant need to dig her claws into Ridge, dragging him back home to her.
Imagine Stephanie and Brooke ripping one another’s companies apart, leaving almost nothing standing when they’re done, and forced to join forces against an outside enemy — Jackie M’s! While they were hell bent on one another’s destruction, Jackie Marone was hell bent on destroying them both to become the top of the fashion heap.
Instead, the writers give us the same old, same old.
I’m going to follow MarkH’s advice and try to appreciate what the writers are doing right. At the same time, I hope the writers will begin to appreciate those of us who’ve hung in there, continuing to support daytime with our hearts when our heads tell us to RUN! It’s ok if they want to repeat some of the storylines of the past, but repetitive storylines are always less noticable when the writers give us something else to go along with it.